Securities Litigation Intelligence

See the Signal.
Examine the Evidence.

Early detection and source-linked research for the people investigating, defending, and evaluating securities matters.

From a Headline to a Researchable Record

The useful question is not just what happened. It is what the source establishes, what it does not, and what to examine next.

Retrospective Public-Source Example

Nikola Corporation

Reported Event

The SEC announced a $125 million settlement with Nikola concerning misleading statements about its products, technology, and commercial prospects.

SEC Release 2021-267

Important Qualification

Nikola settled without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings. The settlement does not establish the merits or value of a separate private claim.

Research Question

Which earlier company statements and contemporaneous records support or contradict the alleged chronology?

A historical illustration of the report structure, not a live alert, a Babel-first detection, or a current case recommendation.

Read the Example

Detect. Research. Review. Deliver.

A repeatable investigation workflow, with human judgment before consequential work reaches a subscriber.

  1. Detect

    Watch disclosures, market reactions, public announcements, and available court records.

  2. Research

    Preserve available sources. Compare earlier statements, build the timeline, and look for contrary evidence.

  3. Review

    Examine the exact report and its sources. Separate facts, allegations, open questions, and legal judgment.

  4. Deliver

    Release approved intelligence into the Terminal. Keep later developments connected to the same matter.

One Record. Three Ways to Use It.

A concise daily view, a timely opportunity, and the research behind both.

Morning Briefing

New developments, upcoming lead-plaintiff deadlines, and direct links to deeper company research.

Founder draft delivery is operating. Subscriber delivery is in development.

Opportunity Alert

A potential matter presented for prompt review, whether detected by Babel, announced by a firm, or newly filed.

Review and private staging are built. Subscriber email transport is not yet enabled.

Research Report

A source-linked chronology, earlier disclosures, price context, competing explanations, and an explicit collection plan.

Available in the prototype. Scope and source gaps are shown for each record.

Explore the Terminal

One Factual Record. Different Decisions.

Explore the workflow for your role.

Cross-border matters need the original record. Explore the Asia Desk

Know What You Can Rely On

Inspectable sources, visible limitations, and a person accountable for release.

Our Commitments
Does a signal mean a viable legal claim?

No. A market move or disclosure starts an investigation. The record must also address contrary evidence, alternative explanations, and the legal questions requiring counsel’s judgment.

Can I inspect the underlying sources?

Reports link to source locations and available preserved versions. Access to original court documents depends on availability and document-level permissions. Missing sources stay visible as gaps.

Does Babel guarantee the earliest alert?

No. Earlier discovery is the goal, measured against captured public notices and filings. Coverage gaps and source delays matter; a later discovery is never relabeled as an early detection.

Is Babel a law firm or a document-upload tool?

Neither. Babel Future Inc. is a research and technology company, not a law firm. The subscriber experience delivers intelligence; it does not accept client files or subscriber research requests.

Start With a Matter You Know

Review the sources, challenge the analysis, and see how the workflow fits your practice.

Request a Demo
Back to the Platform

Retrospective Public-Source Example

Nikola Corporation

A compact demonstration of source-grounded reporting. This is not a current case recommendation or evidence that Babel detected the matter before anyone else.

The Public Record

On , the SEC announced that Nikola agreed to a $125 million penalty to settle charges about misleading statements concerning its business and technology.

Nikola neither admitted nor denied the findings. This enforcement outcome should not be treated as a judgment about a separate investor’s private claim.

Open the SEC Announcement

What the Next Research Pass Needs

  • The exact earlier company statements and their publication dates.
  • Contemporaneous records supporting or contradicting those statements.
  • Relevant market data and competing explanations for price changes.
  • The applicable complaint, procedural record, and later developments.

This illustration contains one SEC announcement, not the full research packet, a complete docket, an event study, or a legal conclusion. It does not establish first public knowledge.

Request a Demo to review the prototype workflow and its current coverage.

The factual record before the complaint arrives.

Babel tells a company and its outside counsel what is happening in an issuer's home market before it becomes a U.S. disclosure problem, market event, regulatory inquiry, or securities lawsuit. Matter by matter first; portfolio-wide when you are ready.

  1. Early warning on issuer clients Prototype

    Reviewed risk events on the Terminal, framed for defense readers, when a restatement, non-reliance filing, auditor change, or sharp corrective decline lands on a company you represent, with the screening record attached.

  2. Rapid orientation after a price move or a new complaint Prototype

    An issuer orientation brief: the disclosures cited to EDGAR, potential claim theories requiring legal review, a provisional class period, a market-adjusted exposure range with every assumption printed, insider activity, forum-selection clauses, and the plaintiff bar's likely timeline.

  3. Compare the alleged chronology with the earlier record In Development

    Set the chronology a complaint alleges beside the earlier original-language information record, and see what the complaint may omit or oversimplify. Today this is prepared matter by matter with attorney review; the automated comparison is in development.

  4. Investigation paths, framed as questions for counsel Prototype

    Prior public knowledge, competing causes for the decline, materiality, scienter, and loss causation, each mapped to the evidence that bears on it. Babel presents the record and the question; it never presents an automated legal conclusion.

  5. Continuous portfolio monitoring Planned

    After a matter engagement, standing monitoring of a firm's issuer clients across home-market sources, filings, and dockets.

What a defense matter panel looks like.

One row per item in the record: where it came from, when, what the company had disclosed, what the market did, and what counsel should ask next.

Illustrative Example. Fictional issuer, fictional facts, shown to demonstrate the format.

SourceTimeCompany disclosureMarket effectEvidentiary statusQuestion for counsel
Provincial regulator notice (original Chinese, translated)Day 0, 09:40 localNone; prior 10-K states operations are "in compliance with applicable local regulation"No U.S. trading yetKnown fact (primary source)When did the company first receive the notice?
Employee post on a discussion forumDay 1NoneNone observedAllegation (unverified)Does any internal record corroborate the claim?
Local business press reportDay 3NoneShares down 4.1% on elevated volumeKnown fact (secondary source)Was the information public in the U.S. market on Day 3?
Company 8-KDay 9Discloses the inquiry; revises guidanceShares down 27.5%; sector index down 1.2%Known fact (primary source)Which portion of the decline is attributable to the disclosure?
Wire-service investigation announcementDay 10NoneNone distinctAllegation (plaintiff firm)What class period will the complaint likely plead?
Complaint filedDay 38NoneNone distinctAllegation (pleading)Does the alleged chronology account for the Day 3 report?

Language such as "the company disclosed," "the source reports," and "the complaint alleges" is deliberate. Babel Future does not determine fraud, liability, materiality, disclosure duties, scienter, or damages.

Your company's exposure, before it becomes a filing.

For the general counsel and compliance team of a public company, the question is: where is our own compliance and litigation exposure forming, from what the company does in the financial markets and from the companies it invests in, acquires, or takes public? Babel Corporate Risk watches both, and hands the decision to the people who own it.

  1. The entity's own market conduct Prototype

    Your own disclosures, filings, and market events, read the way the plaintiff bar and the regulators read them: restatements, non-reliance, auditor changes, delayed filings, executive departures, going-concern language, and the market reaction to each. Every flag cites the filing passage.

  2. Your investments: public companies Prototype

    For each public holding or counterparty: forum-selection and governing-law clauses, prior securities litigation and investigations, insider activity, and available new complaints and reported lead-plaintiff deadlines. Archive and source coverage can be incomplete.

  3. Your investments: private companies and pre-IPO or SPAC targets In Development

    Public-source monitoring of private portfolio companies and of targets approaching a listing: home-market regulatory notices, litigation, and media in the original language, and, after listing, the same disclosure watch as any public issuer. No scraping of restricted platforms; public and licensed sources only.

  4. Connection to prior statements and risk disclosures In Development

    Each emerging issue is set against what the entity has already said in its filings, risk factors, fund documents, and investor communications, so the team sees which prior statements a development could implicate.

  5. A compliance and disclosure issues queue Planned

    Every developing issue carried with its status: known fact, unverified allegation, evidence gap, or awaiting human review. Nothing is silently promoted from allegation to fact.

  6. Escalation packages and preservation Planned

    When an issue may warrant the disclosure committee, the investment committee, or outside counsel, the record travels as one package: facts, allegations, prior statements potentially implicated, the open questions, and the people and records to consider preserving.

What a corporate and investor risk queue looks like.

The queue exists to keep four things from blurring together: what is known, what is alleged, what is missing, and what a human must decide.

Illustrative Example. Fictional entities, fictional issues.

  • Known Fact

    A portfolio company's overseas subsidiary received a product-safety inquiry from a provincial regulator on 08/14. Primary source on file, original language preserved. The company's prior 10-K risk factor on product compliance is potentially implicated; the fund's own disclosure of the position is unaffected so far.

  • Allegation

    Forum posts claim a pre-IPO target delayed recalls for a quarter. Unverified. No internal record reviewed. Not to be treated as fact, and not yet a diligence finding.

  • Evidence Gap

    Whether the entity's own management received the inquiry before its quarterly investor letter. The record does not show it either way. A question, not a finding.

  • Human Review

    Whether the inquiry warrants escalation to the disclosure committee or a hold on the position. Package prepared; decision reserved to counsel and the committee.

Babel supports the legal, compliance, and investment teams. It does not make the disclosure or investment decision, and it does not replace counsel. Babel Future provides no investment advice.

Portfolio exposure, explained. Recoveries, never missed.

For the legal, compliance, and investment teams of asset managers, pension funds, sovereign funds, family offices, and the institutions of Hong Kong, Singapore, Tokyo, Seoul, and Taipei: what in the portfolio is becoming a securities matter, what is recoverable, and by when.

  1. Public holdings watch Prototype

    For each public holding: the disclosure signals that precede litigation, forum-selection and governing-law clauses, prior securities litigation and investigations, insider activity, and reviewed signals when a restatement, non-reliance filing, auditor change, or sharp decline is collected. Timing depends on source availability and review.

  2. New complaints, deadlines, and recoverable loss Prototype

    Available securities actions naming a holding, the reported lead-plaintiff window, and sourced movant information, so a fund with a large loss can decide whether to seek appointment or wait for the settlement claim. Damages three ways with every assumption printed.

  3. Investor Recovery Desk In Development

    The exposure inside a holding, the recoverable loss once a case is filed, the claim deadline, and, where losses warrant representation, an introduction to U.S. counsel. Babel Future does not represent investors, share fees, or give investment advice.

  4. Private companies and pre-IPO or SPAC targets In Development

    Public-source monitoring of private portfolio companies and targets approaching a listing: home-market regulatory notices, litigation, and media in the original language, and, after listing, the same disclosure watch as any public issuer.

  5. Expert Line-up for cross-border claims Planned

    Qualified foreign-law experts, beginning with Chinese law, for the questions a recovery in a cross-border matter turns on.

Babel Future provides no investment advice and takes no positions on any security. It reports what the public record shows and what the deadlines are.

Offering exposure, before the registration statement and after it.

Underwriters answer for the registration statement under Sections 11 and 12, and brokerages answer for what they sold and to whom. Babel gives investment banks, broker-dealers, and their counsel the issuer's record before an offering and the watch that follows it.

  1. Issuer record before an offering In Development

    The home-market regulatory, litigation, and media record of an issuer with material Asian operations, in the original language beside translation, organized for the due-diligence file and the comfort process.

  2. Post-offering disclosure watch Prototype

    Reviewed risk events on the Terminal when an issuer the desk underwrote files a restatement, non-reliance notice, auditor change, or delayed report inside the Section 11 window, with the screening record attached.

  3. Complaints naming the syndicate Prototype

    Collected securities actions, sorted by category, with available court, judge, filing-firm, and lead-plaintiff deadline information. Coverage is not a complete national docket feed.

  4. Enforcement and regulatory watch Prototype

    SEC litigation releases and administrative orders, and Chinese regulator penalty decisions, filed daily into the Knowledge Layer with their rights basis, searchable by issuer, person, and firm.

  5. Customer-dispute and arbitration category Planned

    Brokerage customer disputes and arbitration awards as their own category alongside the five litigation categories.

Screen the matter. Size the exposure. Watch it move.

Litigation funders decide whether a securities matter is worth backing; directors-and-officers insurers decide what a policy is likely to face. Both need the same reviewed record, read early.

  1. Matter screening Prototype

    The screening memo for each flagged issuer: the disclosures cited to the filing, the market reaction measured, the candidate class period, and the Securities Act exposure when an offering sits inside the window.

  2. Damages and exposure ranges Prototype

    Market-adjusted exposure ranges with every assumption printed, insider activity, forum-selection clauses, and the plaintiff bar's likely timeline, in one brief.

  3. Contest and judge intelligence Prototype

    Sourced movant, claimed-loss, and proposed-counsel records, with collection gaps shown; and available profiles of the judges assigned to the matter.

  4. Insured-issuer watch Prototype

    Reviewed risk events on the Terminal for the issuers in a book of business when a disclosure event or a complaint arrives, framed for defense readers.

  5. Funded-portfolio monitoring Planned

    Standing monitoring of every funded or insured matter: docket movement, rulings, settlement signals, and the deadlines that follow.

Babel Future does not fund, insure, or advise on any matter. It provides the record and the ranges; the decision stays with the funder or the underwriter.

Who we serve.

One protected intelligence layer, read from six vantage points. Choose yours; each journey shows what is live today, what is in development, and what is planned.

Beyond account details, Babel collects nothing from subscribers. Every customer reads the same public and licensed record from its own vantage.

Detect the case early. Screen it fast. Move first.

The same source-linked record that orients a defense team gives plaintiff counsel the earliest view of a forming case and the fastest read on a filed one.

  1. Early case detection Prototype

    SEC filings scanned for the disclosures that precede litigation: restatements, non-reliance, auditor changes, going-concern doubt, delayed filings, executive departures, screened alongside market reactions and organized into a draft memo for review.

  2. Case screening with a source-linked memo Prototype

    Each flagged issuer arrives with the filing passages cited, the market move measured, the candidate class period, and the Securities Act exposure noted when a registered offering sits inside the window.

  3. New-complaint alerts and lead-plaintiff deadlines Prototype

    Collected federal securities actions, with available court, judge, filing-firm, and deadline information. An estimated deadline stays labeled until the notice is confirmed; missing archive results do not prove no complaint was filed.

  4. Contest intelligence Prototype

    Available movants, claimed losses, trade-cleanliness checks against price ranges, and damages scenarios, with source and collection gaps shown. Lead Plaintiff Intelligence →

  5. Judge intelligence and the Babel Library Prototype

    Profiles of the bench, and a sourced, fact-checked library of the cases and rulings that govern securities litigation, with damages worked on your own device. Judge Intelligence →

Beyond account details, Babel collects nothing from subscribers. Every customer reads the same public and licensed record from its own vantage; what a subscriber reads, searches, or calculates on the Terminal is not recorded or shared.

The Babel Terminal

One workflow, from signal to reviewed intelligence.

The Babel Terminal is the subscriber's window onto the engine. Everything below is monitored continuously, reviewed by a securities litigator, and delivered on the Terminal; email delivery is in development. There is no chat window; there is finished work.

01 · Find the Matter

The Next Deadline, in View

Move from the deadline watch to the underlying matter. Review dates beside the available source record.

02 · Inspect the Record

Sources Beside the Story

Read the allegations, rulings, and outcomes as distinct parts of the Babel Library. Follow the source links and inspect unresolved questions.

03 · Explore the Loss

Assumptions Made Visible

Run claimant and class-wide estimates in your browser. Your trading record stays on your device; estimates remain subject to review.

  1. Signal Prototype

    SEC filings are scanned for the language that precedes litigation, screened alongside market reactions and organized into a draft memo with source links.

  2. Review Prototype

    Every flagged event passes an operator review queue. Approved events become briefings and alerts; nothing reaches a subscriber unreviewed.

  3. Briefings and risk alerts Prototype

    A daily litigation briefing and reviewed risk events, framed for plaintiff and for defense readers, on the Terminal. Email delivery of the briefing and alerts is in development.

  4. New complaint filings and deadlines Prototype

    Collected federal securities matters, sorted into securities class actions, individual actions, derivative actions, SEC enforcement actions, and other securities matters, with court, judges, first-filing firms, and the estimated lead-plaintiff window, plus an interactive deadline watch.

  5. Contest intelligence and damages Prototype

    Movant reports with loss ranking and trade cleanliness, and a damages calculator for one claimant and for the class: LIFO and FIFO, in-and-out shares excluded under Dura, the PSLRA 90-day lookback cap, and proportional-trading and two-trader class-wide models. Details →

  6. Judge intelligence Prototype

    Education, appointment, prior experience, and securities-case activity for district and magistrate judges. Details →

  7. Delivery only Prototype

    Beyond the account details needed to sign you in (name, firm, work email, credentials), Babel collects nothing from subscribers. The Terminal takes no questions, uploads, or trades; the damages calculator runs in your browser against public price history, and nothing you enter leaves your device. Research is commissioned by Babel from public sources and delivered after attorney review.

  8. Asia Desk Prototype

    Original-language coverage of flagged Asian issuers from public sources, preserved beside translation. Details →

  9. Babel Library and the record since the PSLRA Prototype

    Landmark securities class actions, the China and cross-border line of cases, SPAC-era matters, and the Supreme Court rulings that govern them, each entry sourced and fact-checked; plus filing counts by year since 1996 and the public docket record, growing nightly.

  10. Investor Recovery Desk In Development

    For institutional investors in the United States and across Asia: the exposure inside a holding, the recoverable loss, the deadline, and, where losses warrant representation, an introduction to counsel. Babel Future does not represent investors.

  11. Expert Line-up Planned

    Qualified foreign-law experts, beginning with Chinese law, to ascertain the law and deliver the expert report a court can rely on.

Market-reaction figures currently use a prototype price feed; a licensed market-data source precedes commercial launch. Coverage is real but partial: SEC filings, federal dockets, and public home-market sources today, expanding by jurisdiction and source.

Know the contest. Inspect the record.

Follow deadlines, inspect complaint documents, explore loss estimates and read reviewed contest reports in separate workspaces. Each report identifies the source case behind a movant and the gaps that still need checking. During beta, source coverage and roster completeness require verification before publication.

What the Contest Report contains
  • Complaint record, observed original and amended filings, with document links and coverage status.
  • Movants and proposed counsel, drawn from reviewed motion records, with claimed losses where recorded.
  • Case origin, court and case number for each movant, identifying those outside the earliest confirmed case.
  • Parallel-case review, confirmed related cases and consolidation, transfer or stay notes tied to the record.
  • Separate loss analysis, on-device LIFO and FIFO estimates with assumptions and limitations visible.
  • Review history, a dated report snapshot approved before it appears in the Terminal.
For Plaintiff-side Firms

Competitor intelligence, not homework.

Read the recorded movants, proposed counsel, claimed losses and originating cases together. Inspect the motion papers and unresolved coverage gaps before making your own assessment of the contest.

For Defense-side Firms

Know who you are going up against.

Follow proposed lead counsel and parallel proceedings from a common source-linked record. Separate what a movant requests from what the court has actually ordered.

Know the bench before you brief it.

The judge assigned to a securities case shapes everything, the motion-to-dismiss odds, the class-certification timeline, the settlement posture, the fee award. Babel profiles the district judges and magistrate judges drawing securities cases, and is building toward complete docket-history analytics.

Every profile includes
  • Education, law school and other degrees, with the years received.
  • Appointment, the president who appointed the judge.
  • Prior professional experience, practice, prosecution, academia, and earlier judicial service.
  • Securities-case activity, the judge's current and recent securities docket, one click away.
  • Magistrate judges too, where a magistrate judge has been assigned, a separate profile, because so much of the case runs through that chambers.
For Plaintiff-side Firms

Forum realities, before you file or move.

Before filing, before the lead-plaintiff motion, before opposing a transfer, know how this bench has actually handled securities cases, and write for the reader you have.

For Defense-side Firms

Calibrate strategy and budget to the bench.

The realistic motion-to-dismiss assessment, the discovery posture, the settlement conversation with the carrier, all of it starts with who the judge is. Walk into the client meeting already knowing.

Total docket memory.

Babel is learning every securities class action and Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement matter on record, every docket, every order, read end to end, so profiles will show how each judge has actually ruled: motions to dismiss, class certification, settlement approval, and fees.

The facts begin in the issuer's home market.

For a U.S.-listed company with material Asian operations, or a U.S. company with material Asia exposure, the story that becomes a securities case usually surfaces first at home: in local regulatory notices, local media, and local investor discussion, in the local language. The Asia Desk reads that market so a legal team sees the exposure before the American market does.

Original language, preserved

Every captured item keeps its original text beside the translation, with source, capture time, jurisdiction, and review status. Anyone who reads the original can check the record.

Local regulatory and media context

Coverage begins with the Chinese-speaking markets, where the founder's case experience is deepest, and widens across Asian issuer jurisdictions. Sources today: public regulatory notices, public news coverage, and deep links into public discussion venues.

Linked to the U.S. consequence

Each home-market fact is set against the company's U.S. filings and prior statements, the market reaction, and the litigation theories it bears on. The Asia Desk is not an add-on; it is where the chain begins.

Sourcing is compliant by design: public sources and deep links today, licensed vendor access as it is adopted. Babel does not scrape restricted social-media platforms or their comment sections.

Built on real cross-border case experience.

The Asia Desk connects Chinese-language source material with the U.S. disclosure and litigation record, preserving original passages beside translations so readers can inspect the basis of each finding.

Investor Recovery Desk In Development

For the institutions of Hong Kong, Singapore, Tokyo, Seoul, and Taipei: the exposure inside a U.S.-listed holding, the recoverable loss once a case is filed, the claim deadline, and, where losses warrant representation, an introduction to U.S. counsel. Babel Future does not represent investors or share fees.

Expert Line-up Planned

Cross-border cases turn on foreign law: whether evidence held in China may be produced, what a home-market regulator required, how a foreign filing should be read. A line-up of qualified foreign-law experts, beginning with Chinese law, to ascertain the law and deliver the report.

Coverage, stated honestly

Region-focused monitoring of flagged issuers is live for mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Continuous monitoring of every subsidiary, executive, and regulator is planned, not live.

Why the tower.

In the story of Babel, one people speaking one language could build anything. Securities litigation is the opposite condition: the decisive information is scattered across filings, dockets, price data, and foreign-language sources, and every gap between an event and its understanding is someone's loss. Babel Future exists to close that gap, to gather the market's scattered tongues into one reviewed signal for the people who act on it.

The tower represents a shared language for complex work. Babel Future Inc. connects a disclosure to its original source, a complaint to its docket, and a translated passage to the words it came from. Our aim is not to flatten disagreement into one answer, but to give people working across languages and jurisdictions a common, inspectable record.

The Deep Research System

Operated under artificial intelligence.

The Babel Deep Research System connects source discovery, evidence retrieval, analysis, cross-checking and attorney review. Different models examine the record from different angles; disagreements and missing evidence remain visible rather than being smoothed into a confident answer. Models are replaceable components; the evidence discipline is permanent. And there is no chatbot: subscribers receive finished, reviewed intelligence, not a text box.

The Commitments
  • Attorney review on everything customer-facing.
  • Evidence before drafting, every claim traceable to an inspectable source.
  • Both sides served, plaintiff and defense, on one intelligence layer.
  • Public and licensed sources only, with every claim traceable to its source.
  • Delivery only: beyond the account details needed to sign in, Babel collects nothing from subscribers, so there is nothing of their work to train on, sell, or leak.

Our Team

Founder and CEO

Eric Jun Bi, Esq.

Mr. Bi is a litigation attorney with experience in cross-border securities class actions, complex high-stakes litigation, and commercial litigation matters.

He earned a J.D. from Cornell Law School and an LL.B. from Yanching Institute of Technology. He has practiced litigation in both the People’s Republic of China and the United States, with substantial experience in cross-border securities class actions.

Privacy Policy

Effective 09/05/26

The short version

Babel Future Inc., a Delaware corporation, operates this website and the Babel Terminal. This website collects nothing about you. If you become a subscriber, we collect only what is needed to run your account: Babel delivers intelligence; beyond that account information, it collects nothing from you. The Terminal takes no questions, uploads, or trades; anything you calculate on it runs in your own browser and never reaches us.

Visitors to this website

This website sets no cookies and uses no analytics, advertising, or tracking technologies of any kind. Visiting it transmits nothing about you to us.

What we collect from subscribers

When a firm subscribes to the Babel Terminal, we collect the account information needed to provide the service: names, firm affiliation, work email addresses, sign-in credentials, and the subscription's configuration. That is all. The Terminal has no channel for submitting questions, documents, or trades, and we keep no record of what an account reads, searches, or calculates. The damages calculator runs entirely in your browser; the only request it makes to us is for public price history of a ticker.

How we use it, and how we never use it

  • We use subscriber information only to provide, secure, and support the service, authenticating sign-ins, delivering the intelligence the subscription covers, and communicating about the account.
  • We do not use subscriber information to train any artificial intelligence model, and because we collect none of your work, there is nothing of yours to train on.
  • We do not sell subscriber information, and we do not share it with anyone except the service providers that operate our infrastructure (hosting and email delivery), who are bound to confidentiality and may not use it for their own purposes.
  • We treat legal and financial information as sensitive by default. Access within Babel Future is limited to what operating the service requires.

Retention and deletion

We keep subscriber information for as long as the subscription is active and as long afterward as the law and our professional obligations require. A subscriber may request deletion of its account information at any time by writing to info@babelfuture.com.

Changes and contact

If this policy changes, the new version will be posted here with a new effective date. Questions about privacy: info@babelfuture.com.

Terms of Service

Effective 08/29/26

What Babel Future is, and is not

Babel Future Inc., a Delaware corporation, operates this website and the Babel Terminal. It is a research and technology company. Babel Future Inc. is not a law firm, does not practice law, and does not provide legal advice. Nothing on this website or in any Babel Future work product is legal advice, and neither visiting this site nor subscribing to the service creates an attorney-client relationship with Babel Future or with any person affiliated with it. Babel Future likewise does not provide investment, financial, or trading advice.

The nature of the intelligence

Babel Future's work product is research intelligence assembled from public and licensed sources: regulatory disclosures, court records, market data, and reporting. It reports what sources disclose, it does not allege wrongdoing by any company or person, and no mention of any company on this website or in any work product is an allegation, a solicitation, or a recommendation. Deadlines described as estimated (including lead-plaintiff deadlines calculated from filing dates) must be independently verified before anyone relies on them. Professional judgment on any legal matter belongs to the licensed attorneys who exercise it.

Use of this website

This website is provided for general information, “as is” and without warranties of any kind. You may browse it freely; you may not misrepresent an affiliation with Babel Future, interfere with the site's operation, or use automated means to burden it. Subscriptions to the Babel Terminal are governed by a written subscription agreement, which controls over these terms for subscribers.

Intellectual property and liability

The Babel Future name, this website, and all Babel Future work product are the property of Babel Future Inc. To the fullest extent the law permits, Babel Future's liability arising from use of this website is limited to the amount you paid to use it, which, for this free website, is nothing.

Governing law and contact

These terms are governed by the law of the State of New York. Questions: info@babelfuture.com.